If you really have no idea how to do caching then I highly recommend that you at least use this: t/141331
forum
osu!api open beta 5b6667
posted
Total Posts
90
Just recently found this. Pretty cool, helps me a lot to gather information and whatnot. But I got questions to ask:
1. Is it possible to get more than 5 events/recent activities from /api/get_? Since profile page offers more than the API does.
2. Pretty much just a suggestion. Perhaps can you add the information about infringements into /api/get_?
1. Is it possible to get more than 5 events/recent activities from /api/get_? Since profile page offers more than the API does.
2. Pretty much just a suggestion. Perhaps can you add the information about infringements into /api/get_?
This like an almost a year threads, i don't know where do i ask about API things, most of s push me to the forum. And i don't know if this would be answered or not, but i kinda like to ask something..
The API stats for osu!Mania,
in the game there is a 200 Hit, but in stats there is no such thing for that...
so is that means 200 count as 300 hit on the stats? ... thank you !
#48 issues on GitHub
The API stats for osu!Mania,
in the game there is a 200 Hit, but in stats there is no such thing for that...
so is that means 200 count as 300 hit on the stats? ... thank you !
#48 issues on GitHub
I want to request something (not an API request but some data). Can someone send me some of their cached hits on /api/get_match? I want to do (or try) something related to multiplayer matches but I need some data to test with, especially matches with FreeMod because I want to make sure that I did the mod enum right on my application.
Say some guys app tracks names primarily (me, it cycles through logs for names not UIDs and editing the name to UID would use way too much in resources and would break logging, unless you want logs like <39283> Hi there greg) it'd make migrating a from the old name to the new much easier/faster. As for the profile, a quick view of source tells me I'm dumb and I need to hover over the name, didn't know that. Whoops.peppy wrote: 1vo5i
what for? and it is still in profiles
Not as easy as that seeing how my stuff comes directly from IRC with no middleman for conversion. If there was a version of Bancho that used UID; I'd use it and create a postprocessor for converting the UID to real name but its a pain creating a preprocessor to convert to UID and a postprocessor to convert from for human readable format especially seeing the quantity people talk in all channels and the amount of API calls that'll be, even with caching it'll still be heavy.peppy wrote: 1vo5i
Logging based on name is horribly wrong. You should be using id from the start..
Probably phrased that wrong as I'm typing this from my phone but you get my drift.
That is one option. One that I have been thinking about at that. However, to get an API key you have to apply for access. The form on which you do so is quite obviously meant for developers only. Really, what I'd like is to have Peppy's opinion on what to do for this one.XPJ38 wrote: 25405y
Request your s to enter their own API key.
For API feature requests, please use the issue tracker here.
Is it possible to access either the number of all ranked scores done or number of bonus PP a player have? Or maybe you can somehow access number of B, C and D-rank scores that player have?
If not, I think it would be a great idea to add it and I am going to explain why.
I heard many times about people wanting to write a calculator / spreadsheet / other, that would allow us to input a new PP score on a certain position of top #100 highscores and calculate how much net PP we would gain from it. I even thought about doing it myself.
The problem is: bonus pp based on the number of ranked maps you have a score on.
Let's start from writing down how you can make such calculation as inserting a new PP score on #N-th position. To do this, we need to:
Now, someone will ask: Can we somehow simplify it, so we don't need to know bonus PP? Well... not really.
Someone that have 100 ranked scores will have about 24.272 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 500 ranked scores will have about 108.02 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 1000 ranked scores will have about 188.036 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 2000 ranked scores will have about 291.214 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 5000 ranked scores will have about 395.941 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 10000 ranked scores will have about 415.636 pp of bonus.
So, you can't suppose that an average have, for example: 200 pp of bonus (1090 ranked scores), because by doing this you could make some s gain or lose even about 10 pp with a single calculation! Purely from their difference with the bonus pp you assumed they have.
If you was to "assume that someone have X bonus pp" and subtract it during calculation, then simply shifted all the scores, multiplying them by 0.95, this person would "lose" 1pp for every 20 bonus pp he have above of your estimation and "gain" 1pp for every 20 bonus pp below your estimation.
Right now you can add number of SS, S and A scores, to get a minimum of the scores a player can have, but it would work almost only for the players that have many thousands of SS/S/A ranks and sometimes even only moderately (unless they have +10k scores...). Even with few 1000s' of plays, getting something like 0.5pp-1pp of error can result in calculation being useless, if the score was to be a very slight improvement or being somewhere at the lower half of top #100 list.
Also, the number of SS/S/A rank plays differ between the players. Some of them can have almost no B/C/D ranks and some of them can even have their plays doubled by adding these ranks into , which can result in few PP of error too. What's the point of it, if the score was to give you +3pp, but error was -3pp and calculation would show you +0pp?
Someone could make a calculator, where a player can add a number of scores manually, leaving the problem to a player, but this number can be still hard to estimate even by themselves. Players with er could try to search for beatmaps they have SS/SSH/S/SH/A/B/C/D rank on and add these all scores, but even amongst them rarely anyone know or that you can do it.
.
So, the best solution would be to take an information about number of scores the player have directly from server, along with the top 100 PP values with precision up to few decimals. This could allow in making a very precise Calculator or Highscores Planner.
.
I would be really grateful for a response in this matter! Also, as a bonus, the most recent reddit post about it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/osugame/commen ... _pp_score/
If not, I think it would be a great idea to add it and I am going to explain why.
I heard many times about people wanting to write a calculator / spreadsheet / other, that would allow us to input a new PP score on a certain position of top #100 highscores and calculate how much net PP we would gain from it. I even thought about doing it myself.
The problem is: bonus pp based on the number of ranked maps you have a score on.
Let's start from writing down how you can make such calculation as inserting a new PP score on #N-th position. To do this, we need to:
- Subtract the bonus pp from total pp. The bonus is: 416.6667 (1- 0.9994^Number_of_scores).
- Subtract all the scores (weighted) that are on the previous positions (that is: #1 to #(N-1)). Not needed for new #1 score.
- Multiply the result by 0.95, to shift all the lower scores down by one position.
- We add the new score, weighted 0.95^(N-1).
- We add all the subtracted previously weighted scores from positions #1 ... #(N-1) back.
- We add Bonus PP.
This gives us new Total PP, after adding a new score at N-th position. If there are some very small errors, they come mostly from our knowledge about top PP scores being imperfect. However, if you was to use things like https://ameobea.me/osutrack/ , instead of taking scores' PP from your profile page, you can make it really precise, at least up to 2-nd or 3-rd decimal!
Now, someone will ask: Can we somehow simplify it, so we don't need to know bonus PP? Well... not really.
Someone that have 100 ranked scores will have about 24.272 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 500 ranked scores will have about 108.02 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 1000 ranked scores will have about 188.036 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 2000 ranked scores will have about 291.214 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 5000 ranked scores will have about 395.941 pp of bonus.
Someone that have 10000 ranked scores will have about 415.636 pp of bonus.
So, you can't suppose that an average have, for example: 200 pp of bonus (1090 ranked scores), because by doing this you could make some s gain or lose even about 10 pp with a single calculation! Purely from their difference with the bonus pp you assumed they have.
If you was to "assume that someone have X bonus pp" and subtract it during calculation, then simply shifted all the scores, multiplying them by 0.95, this person would "lose" 1pp for every 20 bonus pp he have above of your estimation and "gain" 1pp for every 20 bonus pp below your estimation.
Right now you can add number of SS, S and A scores, to get a minimum of the scores a player can have, but it would work almost only for the players that have many thousands of SS/S/A ranks and sometimes even only moderately (unless they have +10k scores...). Even with few 1000s' of plays, getting something like 0.5pp-1pp of error can result in calculation being useless, if the score was to be a very slight improvement or being somewhere at the lower half of top #100 list.
Also, the number of SS/S/A rank plays differ between the players. Some of them can have almost no B/C/D ranks and some of them can even have their plays doubled by adding these ranks into , which can result in few PP of error too. What's the point of it, if the score was to give you +3pp, but error was -3pp and calculation would show you +0pp?
Someone could make a calculator, where a player can add a number of scores manually, leaving the problem to a player, but this number can be still hard to estimate even by themselves. Players with er could try to search for beatmaps they have SS/SSH/S/SH/A/B/C/D rank on and add these all scores, but even amongst them rarely anyone know or that you can do it.
.
So, the best solution would be to take an information about number of scores the player have directly from server, along with the top 100 PP values with precision up to few decimals. This could allow in making a very precise Calculator or Highscores Planner.
.
I would be really grateful for a response in this matter! Also, as a bonus, the most recent reddit post about it:
https://www.reddit.com/r/osugame/commen ... _pp_score/
I'm sorry if this is not the proper place, or if someone already asked this.
I would like to have some of the s' stats, just for personal information, to calculate some numbers etc.
My point is, is there a way to get the first 100-200k players based on their rankings?
I haven't asked for an api key yet, since I'm not even sure if I can do this.
So... Can I?
I would like to have some of the s' stats, just for personal information, to calculate some numbers etc.
My point is, is there a way to get the first 100-200k players based on their rankings?
I haven't asked for an api key yet, since I'm not even sure if I can do this.
So... Can I?
https://osu-ppy-sh.zoneani.me/p/api ^^EMENCII wrote: 5o5p47
So... Can I?
Yes, but... Isn't it too much data?oliebol wrote: 4s592p
https://osu-ppy-sh.zoneani.me/p/api ^^EMENCII wrote: 5o5p47
So... Can I?
the dev-discord server (http://discord.gg/ppy) and ask in the api-channel there
Thank you very much, your help was very appreciatedoliebol wrote: 4s592p
the dev-discord server (http://discord.gg/ppy) and ask in the api-channel there
Hello. I trying to grab information about top 100 scores of a specified beatmap.
But the server receives an empty response. Where error in my query?
But the server receives an empty response. Where error in my query?
$.post(
"https://osu-ppy-sh.zoneani.me/api/get_scores",
{
k : "my_api_key",
b : '1026729',
u : "Wilchq",
m : 0,
type : "string"
},
function(data) {
console.log(data);
}
);
If you specify the "u" parameter, it will return empty unless that player has an score in that map. Remove that parameter.Vostok Sisters wrote: 5cx39
Hello. I trying to grab information about top 100 scores of a specified beatmap.
But the server receives an empty response. Where error in my query?
Also, try using '0' instead of 0 in the "m" parameter.
Put your api key in the "k" parameter if you haven't already.
Full Tablet wrote: j536v
If you specify the "u" parameter, it will return empty unless that player has an score in that map. Remove that parameter.Vostok Sisters wrote: 5cx39
Hello. I trying to grab information about top 100 scores of a specified beatmap.
But the server receives an empty response. Where error in my query?
Also, try using '0' instead of 0 in the "m" parameter.
Put your api key in the "k" parameter if you haven't already.
Nope, same query response
https://github.com/ppy/osu-api/issues/139
It seems like get_scores doesn't work with POST requests in particular. Try doing a GET request instead.
It seems like get_scores doesn't work with POST requests in particular. Try doing a GET request instead.
/api/get_scores
//Ref API
k - api key (required).If I specify the name in the query, does the 's top results return or result what in the top 100 best of all time and s?
b - specify a beatmap_id to return score information from (required).
u - specify a _id or a name to return score information for.
//Ref API
Hello, as I do not think there is something about it yet, it's kind of a feature request;
When requesting information, how do we differentiate an error from a non existent from a restricted from a permanently banned ?
I have a set of s and I am thinking of lowering requests rates depending on activity / API repsonse.
The problems I ran into were Invalid answers : I cannot interprate them as a banned because they happen randomly as well, and I don't want to untrack someone totally legit, but it results in probably many restricted or banned s to generated requests once a day each, lowering the service quality for others :/
If it already exists I didn't know about it,if not this would be a great feature
When requesting information, how do we differentiate an error from a non existent from a restricted from a permanently banned ?
I have a set of s and I am thinking of lowering requests rates depending on activity / API repsonse.
The problems I ran into were Invalid answers : I cannot interprate them as a banned because they happen randomly as well, and I don't want to untrack someone totally legit, but it results in probably many restricted or banned s to generated requests once a day each, lowering the service quality for others :/
If it already exists I didn't know about it,if not this would be a great feature
Hi. I've noticed that the API has been changed from aggregating S+SH and SS+SSH ranks to now providing these values as separate entries in the returned JSON for the `get_` endpoint. This is a great change (although exposing it behind a new version or modified endpoint would have been nice), but it doesn't seem to be returning accurate data.
The `count_rank_s` and `count_rank_sh` attributes are reporting the same value for all s that I've tested. This value is lower than previous values for the `count_rank_s` attribute in the past, leading me to believe that this is a bug in the API.
My guess is that the API is reporting the count of non-HD S ranks for both of those attributes, and that the `count_rank_sh` is innacurate. Can anyone else confirm that this is the case?
The `count_rank_s` and `count_rank_sh` attributes are reporting the same value for all s that I've tested. This value is lower than previous values for the `count_rank_s` attribute in the past, leading me to believe that this is a bug in the API.
My guess is that the API is reporting the count of non-HD S ranks for both of those attributes, and that the `count_rank_sh` is innacurate. Can anyone else confirm that this is the case?
Player368
Why?
please help me, I don `t know why this happens. and it breaks my code
SPOILER
This display site
This display api
This display api
please help me, I don `t know why this happens. and it breaks my code
XPJ38 wrote: 25405y
Is there a fair use limit? (e.g. no more than XX requests per day)
For get_, I suppose there is a mode parameter for getting information for Taiko, CtB and osu!mania? Or do I have to file an issue in GitHub?Nevermind, I found it, the parameter to add is called "m"
Gooood, I totally the 2008 one. Random comment but your image gave me nostalgia lol xd
Can anyone help me understand the /get_beatmaps endpoint?
From my understanding is that based on these variables that you can narrow down what maps you want to search.
For [since] is it possible to find beatmaps that aren't loved or ranked?
Thanks
From my understanding is that based on these variables that you can narrow down what maps you want to search.
these variables
since - return all beatmaps ranked or loved since this date. Must be a MySQL date. In UTC
s - specify a beatmapset_id to return metadata from.
b - specify a beatmap_id to return metadata from.
u - specify a _id or a name to return metadata from.
s - specify a beatmapset_id to return metadata from.
b - specify a beatmap_id to return metadata from.
u - specify a _id or a name to return metadata from.
For [since] is it possible to find beatmaps that aren't loved or ranked?
Thanks
Hello,
I bumped into an issue trying to get the response from a request, that has more than 500 hits, but it's limited to giving 500. Is there a way to send a new request to get the remaining results that didn't fit in the first response(the next 500, and then the next 500 and so on)?
I'm trying to use the get_beatmaps query to get unranked mania maps, and since they are unranked the 'since' keyword doesn't apply and I can't find any other way to control from which point I want to get the results.
I've also opened an issue about it on the github page of the api wiki, but it didn't see much traffic and I'm hoping I can get an advice here.
I bumped into an issue trying to get the response from a request, that has more than 500 hits, but it's limited to giving 500. Is there a way to send a new request to get the remaining results that didn't fit in the first response(the next 500, and then the next 500 and so on)?
I'm trying to use the get_beatmaps query to get unranked mania maps, and since they are unranked the 'since' keyword doesn't apply and I can't find any other way to control from which point I want to get the results.
I've also opened an issue about it on the github page of the api wiki, but it didn't see much traffic and I'm hoping I can get an advice here.
varn88 wrote: 2c3r59
Hello,
I bumped into an issue trying to get the response from a request, that has more than 500 hits, but it's limited to giving 500. Is there a way to send a new request to get the remaining results that didn't fit in the first response(the next 500, and then the next 500 and so on)?
I'm trying to use the get_beatmaps query to get unranked mania maps, and since they are unranked the 'since' keyword doesn't apply and I can't find any other way to control from which point I want to get the results.
I've also opened an issue about it on the github page of the api wiki, but it didn't see much traffic and I'm hoping I can get an advice here.
the osu! api does not a "since" parameter therefore I recommend using bloodcats api
both https://osu-ppy-sh.zoneani.me/api/get_?k=***&u=5540229 work fine for me
peppy wrote: 1vo5i
I've had an API available for a while but until now it has been on a private on-request basis. In order to try and make developing third party services which expand and osu!, I have added an API key setup and started to document the API.
I was just making a web client for osu! and this is going to be very helpful!